<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Enigma Curry - Latest Comments in EnigmaCurry &amp;raquo; Building an Ethernet Tap</title><link>http://enigmacurry.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://enigmacurry.disqus.com/enigmacurry_raquo_building_an_ethernet_tap/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 19:17:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: EnigmaCurry &amp;raquo; Building an Ethernet Tap</title><link>http://www.enigmacurry.com/articles/building-an-ethernet-tap/#comment-2811155581</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I realize I am replying to a Zombie thread, but then, here I am 7 years later reading this article, and maybe someone else will too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rob, you are correct, and for anything more than a temporary or spur of the moment tap, this approach is not adequately engineered.  I own a very nice passive tap I bought years ago that was carefully designed and built to minimize these issues, but I don't know of a source for them anymore.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, the current DualComm replacement  (DCSW-1005U) for the DCSW01500U (helpfully mentioned below by Carl) does not have mirroring.  The difference is in including the "U" on the end.  The Dualcomm DCSW-1005 (without the U) does have mirroring, but sells for $80, not $40.  The ASIN (so you can find it on Amazon) is: B002BSF112&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, Netgear does make a $40 product with mirroring, the NETGEAR ProSAFE GS105Ev2 5-Port Gigabit Web Managed (Plus) Switch (GS105Ev2).  It can be found on Amazon as ASIN B00HGLVZLY.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm not a Netgear fan, but I've just taken a chance and ordered one of these to try.  If it turns out to be junk, I will post an appropriate review of it on Amazon.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just thought this info might help someone searching this topic.  Please forive me for waking the Zombies.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">OlePhart</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 19:17:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EnigmaCurry &amp;raquo; Building an Ethernet Tap</title><link>http://www.enigmacurry.com/articles/building-an-ethernet-tap/#comment-1885342617</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you've been getting break in attempts, this implies you have password authentication turned on.  Generate a key pair and turn off passwords.  It's not as hard as you think and then you won't have to care about Italian kids trying to guess your password &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brywilharris</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 11:52:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EnigmaCurry &amp;raquo; Building an Ethernet Tap</title><link>http://www.enigmacurry.com/articles/building-an-ethernet-tap/#comment-1406727654</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice idea but this is only working on 10/100 Mbit not on Gbit&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;the reason look here&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cubro.net/cubro/index.php/papers-docs/whitepaper/35-passiv-gbit-copper-tap" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.cubro.net/cubro/index.php/papers-docs/whitepaper/35-passiv-gbit-copper-tap"&gt;http://www.cubro.net/cubro/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Facebook User</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 12:31:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EnigmaCurry &amp;raquo; Building an Ethernet Tap</title><link>http://www.enigmacurry.com/articles/building-an-ethernet-tap/#comment-691079889</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I supsect the wiring is wrong for tap B. Notice that Host A to Tap A is line1-line3, and line2-line6. Correct, so all Host A's sending to Tap A's receiving. Unfortunately Host B to Tap is is connected as line3-line3, line6-line6.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Visitor</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:16:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EnigmaCurry &amp;raquo; Building an Ethernet Tap</title><link>http://www.enigmacurry.com/articles/building-an-ethernet-tap/#comment-455841499</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Please, post one article for 1000 Mb Full Duplex tap sniffer?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mailmail@mail.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 05:51:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EnigmaCurry &amp;raquo; Building an Ethernet Tap</title><link>http://www.enigmacurry.com/articles/building-an-ethernet-tap/#comment-135433241</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dualcomm makes a USB-powered switch with port mirroring for ~$30. The DCSW-1005U&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Carl</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:34:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EnigmaCurry &amp;raquo; Building an Ethernet Tap</title><link>http://www.enigmacurry.com/articles/building-an-ethernet-tap/#comment-99427255</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;br&gt;inspired by this I did my own solution with a double network socket. Look here for more information: &lt;a href="http://www.pcnetzwerke.de/uploads/HowToBuildANetworkTap.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.pcnetzwerke.de/uploads/HowToBuildANetworkTap.pdf"&gt;http://www.pcnetzwerke.de/u...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Axel</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:09:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EnigmaCurry &amp;raquo; Building an Ethernet Tap</title><link>http://www.enigmacurry.com/articles/building-an-ethernet-tap/#comment-44803602</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you know if it is possible to create a passive tap if one uses a dial up modem and logs onto a proxy server?  There is the possibility of an extra computer.  Challenging?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MK</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:49:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EnigmaCurry &amp;raquo; Building an Ethernet Tap</title><link>http://www.enigmacurry.com/articles/building-an-ethernet-tap/#comment-30888281</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting article, but I suspect if you were to have the network certified with this tap in place you will find the untwisted pairs, and unjacketed cable has introduced a phenomenal amount of cross-talk between the wires which can drastically reduce network performance.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob Williams</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:28:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>